Monthly Archives: March 2014

Customer Research: Nothing beats listening

conversationConversations count

I was talking to a colleague today about my concern over inundating our audiences with surveys, and the message that this high-tech vs. high-touch method might send.

Customer research (like collaboration) is often an exercise in active listening. Fielding a survey is a great way to get more reliable and credible data about trends in response to specific questions.  But it will never do the whole job in terms of allowing you to listen to – and hear – the whole story.

“When you listen generously, people can begin to hear the truth within themselves, in the space that you’ve created for them.”

Your customers’ experiences with their challenges, and with you, come in many shades of gray. When the insight you seek isn’t black and white, you can’t beat a one on one discussion.  Here are a few methods for gaining customer feedback and insight that are not multiple choice; and how they are typically applied:

First, just listen, one-on-one.  Nothing can replace the one-on-one discussion with your customer. Face to face is best, but even on the phone, an open ended conversation to check in can offer valuable insight on the unpredictable. Remember that if you are able to visit your customer on site, it provides an opportunity to more fully understand the environment in which they work. Do they have an office, or walk around? Is there a computer handy? Wall space, clutter, interruptions?  All of the elements of the workplace they are in can influence how well your solutions might – or might not – work for them. Never assume that you understand your customer’s most troubling challenges until you ask. This is not a multiple choice question. It can be helpful to bring trigger questions:

  • What is the most exciting work that you’re involved in right now?  Anything you’d like to be working on but don’t have the time or resources?
  • What’s looming at this point that you are worried about – what’s keeping you up at night?
  • What’s going to be (or what is) toughest about the job right now?

Informal conversations may not be the place to take notes or bring a tape recorder – but once you are out the door, capture what you’ve heard!  Particularly if you are having more than one of these meetings, your findings can start to blur together. If you are pressed for time, tape record a message to yourself with your “notes” about key points (you can do it on your phone); and then keep track later. After several conversations, you will very likely hear some trends that you’ll want to follow up on.

Follow up:  If you are hearing the same pain point from multiple customers, this is an opportunity to plan ahead for collaboration and think about asking a select group if they are interested in collaborating and brainstorming solutions.

Think about convening a group for more feedback or for collaborative work on the problem. 

Focus groups are usually not fishing expeditions, but are set up with willing customers to gain feedback about a particular product or service, challenge, or issue. These are carefully planned to maximize the interaction of the participants. The most useful number of people for a focus group should be from 6-12; and a strong facilitator is needed to ensure that multiple perspectives are gained, and attendees are encouraged and drawn into the discussion. Questions are preplanned. These are often used to get feedback on a prototype service or product in development, or on a brand statement or promotional approach. They tend to be most useful in testing out a concept “before you really build something”.

Collaborative work groups are something different. Customers who are experiencing a like challenge, but are not sure of the solution may be willing to meet with you to conduct brainstorming sessions that are more loosely guided, but still facilitated to get the most from the group dynamic. There are no wrong answers in a brainstorm, it should be well documented, and only at the end of the exercise does it make sense to conduct a check in to determine if members of the group have identified something they are excited about pursuing.

Now you’re building something.  By the time you get to a pilot test, you will have gained early feedback from some of your customers about the concept around your service or product and how it generally works. Especially if the service or product has an online component, or is a service that is complicated to deliver or explain, you will want to gather a small group of possible early adopters and ask them to pilot test for you. These need to be carefully set up, and their evaluations documented and heard. Assume going in that you may hear feedback that generates a change to your service or product. That’s the purpose. This is where you work out the bugs in your approach; or identify that you need to modify the road you are on. Side benefit: if your pilot testers are influential thought leaders, you are hoping at this point to be able to talk about how well the product worked for them, and identify them as development partners later.  The best of all approaches to design, although it can be time consuming and lengthen your process, is iterative design – where you look to your pilot testers to review and provide feedback at multiple steps in your development, and adjust as you learn from them. Then the process becomes much more of a collaborative one.

Keep checking in.  If you have an existing product or service and you are not collecting customer evaluations, start now. Any evaluation should include a valid way to measure customer satisfaction with the experience they’ve just had. You can start by asking the customer to rate their satisfaction.  But most satisfaction evaluations will also ask “how likely are you to use this service or product again?” and “would you recommend it to a colleague?”  These are usually better indicators of true satisfaction – or dissatisfaction – with what they have experienced. If you get a high number of “maybe” answers on using your service again, it’s likely you have some work to do in order to keep these customers; and those customers that would absolutely recommend you may be the champions and influencers you are looking for in your tribe. Don’t lose track of the power of verbatim comments in your evaluation. These can often shed real light on what is best or worst about the experience.

Remember in using any or all of these tools that the data you gain must be captured, documented, and shared effectively to be worth the effort. Even the insight you gain from an otherwise casual discussion can be reported out in some useful fashion to others.

Cool Link for Collaborative Innovation Networks (AKA swarms!)

Wonderful work out of the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence on Collaborative Innovation Networks (COINS) – see the link here http://www.ickn.org/innovation.html, and if you are interested, explore the rest of their site. www.ickn.org. Also see http://swarmcreativity.net

More to come on this. The work coming out of MIT on COINs is truly fascinating relative to how swarms – marketing, product and service development, or other – really work.

Competitors: Enemies, or part of your swarm?

enemy beeHow can collaborating with competitors bring success?

An increasing trend in business as service organizations become more and more niche oriented is for businesses to actively seek partnerships with competitors. If you have strong and well understood unique skills and competencies, this does not need to be a “zero sum game”. Instead of the equation being weighted to “they win, I lose”; you’ll find that it is possible for both competitors to win, if you are open to partnering up through referrals, subcontracting, or some type of collaboration. And in an arrangement like this, your customer is much more likely to consider it a win.

Whether you partner or not, it is critical to both marketing and strategic planning to know and understand who your competitors are. Who are your customers choosing to do the work or provide the service? Who do they prefer? Why?

When you start out to make a list of your top competitors, keep three things in mind:

  1. Regardless of your knowledge of the community in which you work, your business landscape; if you have not asked this question of your customers, you don’t have an accurate focus on who your competitors are. Find an effective way in your dialogues with customers to make them comfortable sharing with you their ideas about where their options and alternatives lie, and why.
  2. Many organizations make the mistake of not including in their list of competitors the most frequent and often strongest option: DIY. In any decision about a service or program that answers a need, your customers will always consider build or buy. They may collaborate with each other to build their own service, or do it on their own – but count on the fact that it is a top candidate. This is especially true in a service industry, and particularly in a tough economy.
  3. Finally, if you are thinking strategically and plan to be around a while, always spend some time considering whether there may be the potential for disruptive “indirect” competitors. Are there ways that your customers can meet, avoid, or change the game that are outside the box completely?

The next step is where you will spend time understand what your unique strengths and weaknesses are compared to your top competitors. Whether you are serious about partnering with competitors, or you take a more traditional approach, “know thyself”. Identify the areas where your skills, services and expertise are much stronger than the others on your list – and understand the areas that may be weaknesses for you compared to others. In this way, your
communication with customers and stakeholders about where your value fits will be clearer. Additionally, it takes you a step closer to partnering. One good way to understand this is with a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis; which I’ll cover in another post.

How is all this going to help you to compete more effectively?

If you are not interested in partnering to provide a solution, you’ll come out of this exercise with a much clearer understand of your own positioning. What should your messaging emphasize as a uniquely strong capability?

At this point, you should also start to see where opportunities to work together with competitors are surfacing. Do you excel at professional development and training, but you don’t have the systems to produce and publish the tools developed from your work? Is someone else known for their ability to evaluate a problem and consult on planning and implementation; but they don’t provide the training or staffing that their clients might need for the next steps? This is where subcontracting opportunities can become clear, if you are honest and careful in your appraisal. Remember that in an increasingly specialized world, it is unlikely that any organization can be a one stop shop. Partnering to solve a problem can be better for you, and better for the customer.

How does this work if your customers are doing it themselves, or partnering with each other to do it without you? Take a step back and work on understanding what about the solution they’ve found works for them. What does the DIY option offer? What need does it not meet, and are there gaps that might fit in with your specific expertise? If they are building a service that you already offer, why? Can you provide training to help them do a better job? Can you recommend partners that supply something they will need?

What are the benefits of this approach?

  • Better service for your customers and stakeholders.
  • A reputation for being a solution to problems rather than part of the noise.
  • A very effective potential marketing channel, through co-marketing with your competitors to extend your reach.
  • The chance to focus your effort toward building your strengths, rather than struggling to be everything to everybody.